|
|
Page:10
■ Preface 10 work, I have thus added a fourth chapter to the study, which takes the reader in a somewhat different direction . Specifically, this additional chapter describes how the philosopher’s views on several issues—including Mosaic prophecy, the divinity of the Torah, and the purpose of biblical stories—shape Radak’s Pentateuchal exegesis . While my discussions center mainly on theological questions, I also devote considerable attention to Radak’s nuanced readings of the biblical text . As much as possible, however, I integrate my analysis of his exegesis into broader examinations of his theology . In this way, I seek both to maintain an engaging presentation and to illustrate Radak’s synthesis of his scriptural interpretation and religious thought . A notable exception to this method pertains to chapter 3 of the study, which concerns the destiny of human beings . In that instance, it proved helpful to begin by describing Radak’s exegesis, and only afterwards to consider his relevant theological positions more directly . In the latter half of the book, I provide an annotated translation of Radak’s allegorical commentary on Genesis 2 – 4, followed by a newly edited version of the Hebrew text, which serves as a basis for the translation . In an essay introducing the translation, I present an overview of Radak’s allegorical reading, followed by a description of his method . I also provide some brief discussion of his metaphysics, mainly to prepare the reader for certain terminology in the work that is theologically delicate and potentially misleading . A more thorough treatment of Radak’s metaphysics, by contrast, belongs in a consideration of his other esoteric commentary, which relates to the prophetic visions in chapters 1 and 10 of the book of Ezekiel . Despite an increasing number of studies illuminating the works of Radak, his distinctly rich exegesis of the early chapters of Genesis has, to this point, drawn only limited scholarly attention . My hope, therefore, is that by helping to fill this gap, this study will contribute to an enhanced appreciation of Radak’s pivotal and enduring contribution to the interpretation of Scripture .
|
|