sso
| Hello Guest - login | My Account | My bookshelf | My folders
Kotar website
Page:38

The second model , the French one , was based on the principled assumptions of the revolutionary legislation : “ Everything to the individual Jew , nothing to the Jews as a nation , ” ran the maxim . Thus , unlike the Jews of Spanish origin , who had settled mainly in southern France and in Bordeaux , the Ashkenazi Jews in Alsace , for instance , were apprehensive of having to waive their rights to communal autonomy as a precondition to emancipation . In fact , the initial revolutionary legislation , from January 28 , 1790 , was applied only to Sephardic Jews , and was extended to all of French Jewry only in September 1791 . Later on , when the revolutionary fervor had subsided , and the strength of Jewish communal ties , even under conditions of full equality , was acknowledged once more , an assembly of Jewish notables , a “ Sanhedrin , ” was convened and entrusted with the task of clarifying the position of Jews towards non-Jews , in questions of mixed marriages , loyalty to the state , etc . And eventually , the Consistoire , a body meant to replace the former corporative communities , provided collective expression for French Jewry , despite much opposition . A mixed solution had been found , allowing emancipation for individual Jews as well as institutional expression of their collectivity . Despite the official language used , emancipation in France was always accompanied by the expectation of assimilation . It was argued over and again that when the status of Jews within the modern state would be equal to that of non-Jews , they would gradually adopt the practices of the majority . In a political system that proclaimed , in theory at least , the complete separation of religion and state , this process could advance gradually , it was believed , without impediment . These hopes did not completely fade away even during the Third Republic , in which Jews formally enjoyed full equality and to which they demonstrated complete loyalty . The third model is the German one . Here , Jewish emancipation did not have a revolutionary basis , despite an attempt in the National Assembly in this direction during the Revolution of 1848 . In fact , the accepted approach in the various German states , up to the establishment of Bismarck’s Reich in 1871 , was that equal rights could not be granted the Jews before their loyalty had been proven and their ability to integrate into German society had been tested . This stance opened the way for prolonged debate for and against emancipation , for continuous examination of the mores of the Jews , and for repeated efforts to determine whether they indeed came to resemble the general population more closely as time passed or not . Emancipation was , in fact , considered a reward for good behavior . It should not be forgotten , however , that in the German world the concept of emancipation as a reward for loyalty and for proper civil behavior was not applied only to Jews . Bourgeois emancipation in general was intended solely for worthy citizens , and the emancipation of women was almost universally disregarded because , so it was claimed , they lacked the necessary traits for true partnership in the public realm . The fourth model is that characteristic of the Russian Empire , where it was only the Bolshevik Revolution that led to the cancellation of all limitations and prohibitions suffered by Jews . From the time of Catherine the Great to the fall of the empire in 1917 , Russian policy regarding the Jews oscillated between attempts to improve their standing and measures that increased discrimination against them . Forced assimilation was clearly an underlying factor in mandatory conscription for Jews , as well as the attempts to convert them as part of this lengthy compulsory military service . In the educational sphere , too , we find regulations that required Jewish children to receive compulsory Russian education . Sometimes , certain legal concessions were granted the Jews , mainly concerning the right to settle beyond the Pale of Settlement , but leniencies granted to individuals only served to emphasize the limitations upon the masses . While efforts to integrate the Jews in their surroundings were deemed a worthy goal , such efforts were always made – due to the authoritarian nature of the regime – through the introduction of

Posen Foundation


For optimal sequential viewing of Kotar
CET, the Center for Educational Technology, Public Benefit Company All rights reserved to the Center for Educational Technology and participating publishers
Library Rules About the library Help