sso
| Hello Guest - login | My Account | My bookshelf | My folders
Kotar website
Yosef Mealem, Shmuel Nitzan, and Takashi Ui | 236 Usually, and are interpreted as the contestants’ efforts . However, has two possible interpretations . It can be interpreted as the probability of contestant 1 winning an indivisible prize, or as his share in a divisible prize . In turn, the winning probability of contestant 2 or his share in the prize is equal to . Henceforth, we use the second interretation, as in Corchon and Dahm ( 2010 ) , Franke et al . ( 2013 ) , Lee and Lee ( 2012 ) , and Warneryd ( 1998 ) . Although under this interpretation there is no uncertainty in the model and the contestants compete on the certain shares of a divisible prize, we nevertheless preserve the terms “contest” and “CSF” . The asymmetry between the impact of the contestants’ efforts is captured by the parameter . In our extended setting, we do enable the contest designer to control as first suggested by Lien ( 1986, 1990 ) and later by Clark and Riis , This means that the designer can apply struct...  To the book
הוצאת אוניברסיטת בר אילן

CET, the Center for Educational Technology, Public Benefit Company All rights reserved to the Center for Educational Technology and participating publishers
Library Rules About the library Help